Blog Entries

The Customer is Always Right

By:   |  

Category: General Blogs

I dine out a fair amount. I love to try new things. That includes cuisine and drinks. But it was during a recent visit to an English pub in Clapham Junction (in the London borough of Wandsworth) that I realized how I’ve come to take customer service for granted and how very important it is.

I don’t think there has ever been a time when I’ve eaten at a restaurant and had an issue that wasn’t resolved in a professional and timely manner. That was until the second Sunday in March when my family and I went to eat lunch at a pub that is known for its wide range of rotating beers and fine malt whiskies and gins. The pub prides itself on serving quality cask-ale and has a Cask Marque seal of approval, which is an award given to pubs that meet stringent beer serving standards in areas such as temperature, appearance, aroma and taste.

On the pub’s website, it has information about a beer blog, tasting notes for its winter ales and information about a London Ale Trail. It looked like the perfect place to sample some British beers and have a nice lunch with friends and family. (And possibly write a column on my experience there.)

My high expectations for the afternoon were deflated very quickly.

Three of the six of us drank beer. One person knew exactly what he wanted. The other two needed some help—one was interested in a light, easy drinking beer, while the other wanted a dark style beer. Our waiter had no suggestions (other than a Carling) and couldn’t provide a beer list explaining that because the beers change daily, the pub did not have one.

(A chalkboard with what beers were on tap would have been a simple and easy solution for that.) “Ok, can you name some of the beers you have then?” We were met with a blank stare and a Guinness was ordered by default. I also would have had a beer, but without someone being able to tell me what the options were, I was put off and went with a soft drink.
Drinks aside, our food didn’t come out at the same time and when it finally did all come out (after about a 40-minute wait) it was cold.

Our waiter never came back to the table to check on us, no condiments were brought and an extra plate was forgotten along with a side order. You get the idea.

Words with the manager resulted in our drinks being taken off the bill and a fresh, hot bowl of fries. Later she would also take off one of our meals—reluctantly. Offering a simple “I’m sorry” and walking away with very little concern that customers were unhappy with the service.  

There is more to this story, but I realize this has become a bit of a rant. However, hopefully it’s one that can be learned from.

Here are a few tips.

Tip 1: Educate your staff on the drinks that your establishment has available and teach them how to make diners feel comfortable asking for a beer, in this case, that they may not know the name of. How? Make the wait staff experts in different beer styles and teach them how to pass that knowledge to the customer.

Tip 2: Learn how to upsell. Take a familiar beer and compare it to one at a higher price point to drive additional revenue.

Tip 3: A positive attitude can go a long way. Oh, and the customer is always right.

Hunting for the Northern Lights and Discovering Local Beer

By:   |  

Category: General Blogs  |  Tags: beer

Skál! That’s how you say “cheers” in Iceland. But think of how a Viking would say it—that should be the delivery.


Over pints of Ölgeroin’s most popular beer, Engils Gull, two Scots, two Americans, an Australian and a Londoner learned that beer wasn’t legalized in Iceland until 1989. Yes, 1989.

One of the largest and oldest companies in Iceland, Ölgeroin (which means brewery in Icelandic) was founded in 1913 and today not only produces beer, but a number of other drink and food items.

I spent six days in Reykjavik, Iceland, last month with the main goal of seeing the Northern Lights. Mission accomplished on the last night of the trip—it was worth the wait.

In the meantime, the country has so much to offer in and around its capital city. Among them was the brewery tour at Ölgeroin Egill Skallagrímsson.

It turns out that Iceland also went through a Prohibition era of sorts that lasted 73 years. Our guide relayed that the people of Iceland voted in 1908 to ban all alcohol. The ban however, didn’t go into effect until the beginning of 1915.

Don’t think “Boardwalk Empire” though with underground bars and clubs and an Al Capone-type figure leading a squad of bootleggers. It wasn’t exactly like that in Iceland.

There was a partial repeal of the ban in 1933 when the country was threatened by Spain with a trade ultimatum. If Iceland didn’t begin importing Spanish wine, the Spanish would stop buying Iceland fish—the country’s largest export. So wine was allowed.

In 1935, the production of liquors was permitted and that was the first occasion where Iceland’s national drink called Brennivin, a schnapps-like spirit distilled from potatoes with 40 percent alcohol, became available.

Though beer was still outlawed, it was being brewed, just not for the locals. Ölgeroin was brewing beer for export, but in fact, beer like Polar Beer (a light golden lager with 4.7 percent ABV), was brewed for occupying armed forces during WWII and later to the American military base outside of Keflavík. Our guide told us that the “bootleggers” were also the taxi drivers who would have cases of beer in the trunk and sell it to their passengers.  

We got to sample Polar Beer as well as Egils Malt and Appelsín (a fizzy orange drink), which have become a traditional part of Icelandic Christmas celebrations. We also got to sample some selections from Ölgeroin’s microbrewery, Borg Brugghus, which was started in 2007. The microbrewery makes a selection of seasonal and limited-edition brews, many of which sell out soon after they hit the shelves, our guide informed us. They are numbered brews—we got to sample number 10, Snorri. It’s brewed from domestic barley and seasoned with Icelandic organic thyme that mixes a fruity nose with local wild herb flavors. The craft beers were lined up along the top shelf of the back bar in the tasting room of the Ölgeroin building, which it moved into in 2009. The building is one of the best warehouses in Iceland, the brewery proclaims.

The last thing we sampled that evening before hitting the town: a shot of Brennivin, often referred to as Black Death. Skál!

Distilling the Meaning

By:   |  

Category: General Blogs  |  Tags: Distilled Spirits Co, DISCUS, spirits

 

We’re focusing a great deal on craft beer this issue (major congrats to Oskar Blues for earning our inaugural Craft Brewer of the Year Award), so it’d probably be appropriate for me to write about craft beer. But, I’ve written a lot of about the subject lately (including in this issue) and I think I want to talk about spirits. 
 
There were a great many statistical nuggets I took away from the Distilled Spirits Council’s (DISCUS) annual media and analysts briefing last month. For one, total spirits volume grew by 3.0 percent in 2012—an impressive number for any mature beverage category, especially when compared with the likes of U.S. beer and carbonated soft drinks. Volume reached 202 million case equivalents. Total revenue was up an even greater 4.5 percent, rising to $21.3 billion
 
A good deal of overall spirits growth is thanks to the premiumization trend, as a sizeable portion of the category’s growth came from the top two spirits price segments, high-end and super-premium, which grew by 4.8 percent and 8.9 percent, respectively. The two segments on the lower half of the price spectrum, value (the lowest) and premium, grew by a much more modest 1.8 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively. Additionally, the super-premium segment is having a much greater impact than it had 10 years ago. In 2003 the value segment’s total revenue was just under $3.8 billion, while super-premium’s tally was a tad lower than $1.5 billion. Ten years later, value’s annual revenue was only a slightly higher $4.1 billion, but super-premium is getting pretty close to matching it at $3.9 billion.
 
There were plenty more facts and figures DISCUS president and CEO Peter Cressy and chief economist David Ozgo presented at the meeting, but I wasn’t struck so much by what was said, but by what wasn’t said—or at least wasn’t said until the final minutes of the presentation. In the same event held in in each of the past few years, the speakers wouldn’t get five minutes into their presentations without uttering the word “recession” or even “economy” (not including Ozgo’s economist title). But this year I was already packing up my laptop (reporters notebooks are for suckers) before a passing reference to the state of the economy was made late in the session. 
 
And I don’t think that was an accident. When your numbers are as good as spirits’ have been—not to mention steady, as 2011 was similarly positive for the category—it’s perfectly safe to get a sense that things have returned to some form of normal. And when the top-shelf price segments are doing as well as they are, it points to a sustainable trading-up trend that, after a brief recessionary hiccup, is back in full-swing. The gravitation back toward affordable luxury over the past three years is a sign that times could actually be heading back into the “good.” 
 
This in no way is meant to cavalierly dismiss the 7.9 percent unemployment elephant in the room. There’s still a considerable way to go until we collectively reach full recovery. But with some consistently solid numbers coming out of the spirits market, it’s okay to surrender to one’s inner optimist.  

Studying Studies

By:   |  

Category: General Blogs

I was both amused and a little bit frightened the other day—maybe bemused then?—to read widespread media reports about a study linking moderate alcohol consumption to higher risks of cancer.

 
My first reaction was, “Egads! And I thought moderate alcohol drinking was supposed to be good for me!” And it is, or so I’ve read in numerous other studies. And therein likes the problem: when one study reaches one conclusion, and another study a contrary one, what are we supposed to believe? 
 
If, in the example above, having a nice glass of wine or a beer with dinner both guards me from heart disease while at the same time raising my risk of cancer, should I have it? I guess you could say the smart thing would be to make specific choices based on my own situation. If heart disease runs in my family and not cancer, then maybe a drink a day is beneficial. If we have a higher genetic risk of cancer, maybe it isn’t.
 
That is, of course, if we are going to pay much attention to all of these studies in the first place. If you take some time to learn a little about the methodologies used, it quickly becomes clear that really good scientific studies can be hard to come by. Oftentimes other scientists or experts criticize the results of their peers’ studies based solely on the methodologies used. In fact, if you notice, in most articles reporting the studies the reporter will usually include one or two other experts who disagree with its findings.
 
But even without that being the case, my question is are we studying ourselves to death with all these studies?  What’s the impact on our health of being told that everything we enjoy is bad for us? Has anybody ever studied that? It’s gotten to the point where you show me something pleasurable in life, anything at all—yes, including a nice glass of wine or a beer—and I can show you a study that says it’s bad for us. What a bummer!
 
Thankfully, I can also show you a study that says it’s good for us. So, when it comes right down to it, what’s really the point? We’re left pretty much where we started, aren’t we?
 
I guess I’m being a little simplistic here. Sure, there are some studies that are more respectable than others and should be taken very seriously. For example, we all know today that cigarettes are bad for us. But that was not always considered a fact. Our understanding only changed after study after study confirmed it to be true. 
 
But there just seem to be many more studies today that are released into the 24-hour, non-stop news cycles that are not as trustworthy—and they have the potential to do a lot of damage. 
 
The impact of this latest study, which claims to find a link between moderate alcohol consumption and cancer (I have my doubts based on reading about it, but I’m an editor, not a scientist so I’ll hold my tongue), could very well hurt the livelihoods of many hardworking people in the alcohol beverage business the world over. Do the study’s authors ever stop to think about that? I sure hope they are confident with their results before releasing them because this is not a game. Yes, people’s lives will be effected, and sometimes not in the way the study’s authors were thinking. It all leaves me with the burning question: Has anyone ever done a study on the impact of studies?  

Lowering the Bar

By:   |  

Category: General Blogs  |  Tags: beer, craft beer, bartending, customer service

So, a man walks into a bar. He wants to order a pint of fine craft beer so he motions to the bartender. The bartender walks past him, not making eye contact. A few minutes pass and he continues to motion the bartender. Again, no acknowledgment whatsoever. After a few more minutes pass, he finally gets the bartender’s attention. She shoots him a “What do you want?” look and he shouts his order above the noise in the crowded pub. She shouts back, “I can’t hear you,” and walks away. Waiting for the punchline? There isn’t one. This, sadly, is no joke. This sort of thing happens more often than it should. The man in the tale is yours truly. It happened last month.

Look, I get that it was crowded and crowds and noise can be overwhelming. But that’s no excuse for poor customer service. In less-crowded situations I’ve sat at the bar and managed to engage the barkeep a little more easily. This time I wasn’t entirely sure what I wanted to order so I asked for a little insight on one of the many artisanal brews on tap.

Me: What style is it?

Bartender: It’s like Bass.

Me: But it says it has an ABV of 9 percent. That’s a bit high for that style.

Bartender: Well, it’s the same color.

This pub prided itself on its vast selection of craft beers on draught. But it seems that management was more concerned with quantity over quality—the quantity of its taps versus the quality of a trained, informed serving staff.

We seem to hold wait staff in restaurants to much higher standards of human interaction than we do bar staff. What’s the reason for that? There isn’t one, at least there shouldn’t be one. Bartenders are salespeople, just as waiters and waitresses are. They’re there to get you to buy stuff and answer any questions you may have about that stuff so you can make a more informed purchasing decision. I’m not saying that these bars are the rule—but they’re not the exception either. They’re somewhere in the middle of the exception-rule continuum.

And that costs sales, regardless of how negligible that loss would be in the grand scheme of things. It’s certainly not something that the companies that own the brands and the wholesalers that distribute the brands the bar is supposed to be selling take lightly.  

The staff and the owners could argue, “Well, the place is packed, so we’re obviously doing something right. So back off!” But why would anyone ever want to take customer traffic for granted? Exactly how loyal are the customers that happen to be packing that bar on a given night? Maybe they just pushed their way into that particular place because all the other establishments in the neighborhood were even more crowded. And if the managers and staff are giving them no reason to come back, they won’t.

Here’s another thing to consider: social media. If someone has a bad experience in a pub, that place can expect an instantaneous, unflattering tweet or a rather damning review on Yelp.  

The joke may begin with the man (or woman) walking into a bar. But no one’s laughing when the woman (or man) walks out of the bar a few seconds later…and never comes back.